banner image 1
 

Compare technologies



Halogen CFLs and GreenLEDs

If you compare technologies. you will find the differences are staggering. For example:

• compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) are a major hazard to dispose of especially when they break. They contain mercury and phosphorus in quantities sufficient to contaminate 30,000 litres of drinking water to above the EU recommended safety levels

• halogen lamps waste 90% of the energy that they consume, by turning it into heat not light

Here is a table which briefly sets out the main differences between halogens, CFLs and LEDs

Cost of light

Lamp Comparison Chart
Halogens
CFLs
LEDs
Life Expectancy
2,000 to 5,000 hrs
8,000 to 15,000 hrs
30,000 to 50,000 hrs
Kilowatt/hrs pa x 1 Lamp
(hrs in one year = 8760)
306.6 kWh
96.4 kWh
32.4 kWh
Health Effects
UV rays, IR effects, SAD Syndrome
UV rays, IR effects
No UV, No IR
Specialist Disposal (WEEE)
Non domestic only (to Landfill)
Yes (Compliance with WEEE Directive – Specialist Disposal)
Non domestic only (recyclable)
Colour Rendition
Restricted colour options
or Filters Required
Restricted colour options
or Filters Required
Wide range of colours
Dimmability
Yes
Restricted Possibility
Yes
Robustness
Sensitive, Breakable
Sensitive, Breakable
Robust, Solid State
Start-up Time
Almost immediate
Delayed
Immediate
Cost of Ownership
High
Low
Lowest
Recyclability
Landfill
Specialist Disposal
Recyclable
Contaminants
Reasonably Safe
Mercury
None = Safe
Light Efficiency
10-30 lm/W
60-70 lm/W
40-60 lm/W
Energy Efficiency
10%
40%
90%

 


     
Home | Who are we? | How can we help? | Products | Savings | About LEDs | Case studies | Legislation | Newsroom | Contact us
Term of supply | Privacy Policy | Greenled Buy Direct | Site map   Copyright © 2010 Greenled Light Ltd. All rights reserved.